Page 32

9th Because he has not answered on what particular day he
executed titles for said land.
10th Because he has not answered whither or not he knew or
heard previous to the sale of said Land, that Wm R Meyer had
conveyed them to R B Harrison.

For the want of a sufficient answer in the above
particulars Complainant excepts & prays, the judgment of the
Court thereon & that defendant may be compelled to
further amend, or that the bid be taken pro confesso against
him
[Williams Saffold & Williams
Solrs for Complt

Mock & al
vs
Harrison & al]
[Before the Register at office 8 June 1842.
Exceptions, by Complainant, to the answer of Alfred
Harrison, One of the Defendants.

Upon a hearing of the exceptions, by the Register,
& argument thereon by the solicitors of both parties. It is
Ordered by the Register, that the 1st and 4th 6th 8th 9th
& 10th exception, to the defendants answer, be sustained, &
that Defendant answer fully to the matter of said
exceptions forthwith.

As to the 5th & 7th Exceptions, It appears, to the
Register, that the answer of Defendant, as to said
exceptions is sufficiently responsive, & the exceptions are discharged
& overruled. G R Evans Register

The State of Alabama
The amended answer of Alfred Harrison one of the Defts
to the bill of Complaint of Edwards Mock and others in
pursuance of the order and decree of the Honorable J L
Martin chancellor of the Middle Division of said State, The
Defendant further saving & reserving as aforesaid for further answer
says - that he admits that said Wm S May was One of his
Deputy Sheriff at the time he bought said land, as this
defendant supposes he had a right to do, but this defendant did
not authorize him to do so, nor was there any agreement
between him and said man or any other person or persons that
said land was to be bought for Deft within his knowledge
or belief, neither was there any such thing thought of by any
person within his knowledge or belief at the sale - admits
that Meyer was a resident of Lowndes County during
the time of the levy & sale admits that he did not specify
notice given on the Execution on his return but this was
not amitted from any fraudulent motive, supposes

Action by Register on Exceptions to A Harrisons answer [in margin]
Amended answer of A Harrison [in margin]