182

OverviewVersionsHelp

Facsimile

Transcription

Status: Complete

9

it is so far from being true that every conclusion is drawn because the reasoner is disposed to believe is, that it is quite impossible that a conclusion should be drawn because the reasoner is disposed to believe it.

I wish to lead you to see that the defendents confound two disparate categories; the one an act, whose nature is either to exist perfectly definite, or else not be at all, the other, the meaning of a general mental formulation.
To illustrate the sort of blunder I mean drop a stone. [Drop it.]
What caused that stone to fall?
Anybody who should reply that it was the "law of gravitation" would fall into the same sort of confusion between a degree of a court and a sheriff's right arm.

Notes and Questions

Nobody has written a note for this page yet

Please sign in to write a note for this page