16

13

[scroll with small blot ??]

or even

[scroll with infinitesimal blot ??]
This suggests that the relation which the
cut asserts between the universe of
discourse and what is scribed within
it is simply that what is scribed within
is false of the universe of discourse.

Then we may interpret

as meaning “It is false that it rains and
that a pear is not ripe.” But we have
already seen that this is precisely the
whole meaning of the conditional de
inesse; namely that it is false that the
antecedent is true while the consequent is