81

100

Then the exponential of the Ms will be the sam
whose single members are these sams

[ ]

Now my proposition is that, in every case, the
multitude of the exponential is greater than that of
the primitive gath. That is, no matter what
the Ms may be they are always fewer than all the
possible sams of Ms. That is it is impossible to
find any one to one relation such that
every sam of Ms stands in that relation
to an M. How am I going to prove this? I do it