67

O.2

for being fully represented, regardless of our ability to represent it. It is what is common to full representamina of it.

"Why avoid saying 'the existence' of God?" Merely for economy sake. Ideas are so many, words so few in philosophy that two words for one idea is wicked waste. When we sighingly say, "The Campanile of St. Mark's no longer 'exists,'" we mean, reacts against brute forces, so as to get photographed on eye-retinas, etc., though it still acts on our sense of beauty. Why, then, give 'exist' two senses between which we so much need to discriminate? Especially, with the word 'Real'