92

OverviewVersionsHelp

Facsimile

Transcription

Status: Complete

G92

demonstration does not rest solely upon the facts observed, but upon the manner in which those facts have been collected; secondly, that a syllogism infers its conclusion apodictically, while an induction does not; thirdly, that a syllogism enriches our knowledge of ideas, but not our information, which is what Kant meant in saying that it only explicates but does not amplify knowledge, while an induction does amplify our knowledge; fourthly, that the proposed syllogism would be fallacious, because its major premiss is vague, so that it could

Notes and Questions

Nobody has written a note for this page yet

Please sign in to write a note for this page