118

22

does, has no meaning. That is, it leaves the sheet with the same meaning after it was written that it had before.
Neverthe less, I call it a graph.
I call the blank sheet of assertion a graph.
For it stands to graphist and interpreter for all that they agree to.
On the other hand, an expression which contradicts what graphist and interpreter have agreed that they will not deny, such as 'Nothing is true', or

(is a proposition
is not true

violates the first convention, and is therefore not properly an expression of this system.
I do not call that a graph, but the pseudograph.
I say not a pseudograph but the pseudograph because all such expressions are equivalent in this system, all being alike violations of the conventions.
To make the oseudograph on the sheet of assertion would

22

does, has no meaning. That is, it leaves the sheet with the same meaning after it was written that it had before.
Neverthe less, I call it a graph.
I call the blank sheet of assertion a graph.
For it stands to graphist and interpreter for all that they agree to.
On the other hand, an expression which contradicts what graphist and interpreter have agreed that they will not deny, such as 'Nothing is true', or
(is a proposition
is not true

violates the first convention, and is therefore not properly an expression of this system.
I do not call that a graph, but the pseudograph.
I say not a pseudograph but the pseudograph because all such expressions are equivalent in this system, all being alike violations of the conventions.
To make the oseudograph on the sheet of assertion would