63

OverviewVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

4 revisions
gnox at May 14, 2018 02:52 PM

63

Let me prove this by graphs. In each graph which I write, the universe
of discourse with be the members of the gath I am dealing it. Then
nullity will be expressed by [] which is of course the pseudograph. For a universe
with nothing in it is absurd. I add one to this. That is I express that there
is something such that if anything is different from this the graph of nullity holds
for it. That is [] or []. It is the graph of Unity. I add a unit to this. That is I express that
there is something other than what the graph of unity asserts, but for all
that is not this that graph holds. This gives []. It is the graph of Twoness.
I again add a unit, asserting that there is something else but that apart
from this new unit the graph of Twoness holds. This gives []
which is the graph of Threeness. In order to express that
the gath taken as the universe is greater than a given number
you must assert all the diversity that the graph of that number
asserts and also the diversity it denies. That is, we must remove
the large cut. Then in order to assert that our gath is not

Turn to p 72

63

Let me prove this by graphs. In each graph which I write, the universe
of discourse with be the members of the gath I am dealing it. Then
nullity will be expressed by [] which is of course the pseudograph. For a universe
with nothing in it is absurd. I add one to this. That is I express that there
is something such that if anything is different from this the graph of nullity holds
for it. That is [] or []. It is the graph of Unity. I add a unit to this. That is I express that
there is something other than what the graph of unity asserts, for all
that is not this that graph holds. This gives []. It is the graph of Twoness.
I again add a unit, asserting that there is something else but that apart
from this new unit the graph of Twoness holds. This gives []
which is the graph of Threeness. In order to express that
the gath taken as the universe is greater than a given number
you must assert all the diversity that the graph of that number
asserts and also the diversity it denies. That is, we must remove
the large cut. Then in order to assert that our gath is not

Turn to p 72