60

Overview Versions Help

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is ~~highlighted in red~~, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

2 revisions	gnox at Jul 10, 2018 08:53 PM	Compared with
Jul 10, 2018 gnox Nov 25, 2016 jeffdown1	60 114 did not formulate it in general terms. This answer is that we are justified in drawing an induction because the conclusion of an induction is rendered probable by the premisses, according to the doctrine of chances. This I deny, and maintain that the doctrine of chances, rightly applied, does not give any determinate probability to an inductive conclusion unless we make an assumption which really renders the reasoning deductive. In order to show what sort of reasoning it is by which the Laplacians support their dogma, I will show you how they would calculate the probabilities in an example.	60

60

2 revisions

60

60