Letter from Richard Henry Dana to J. M. Earle

ReadAboutContentsHelp
This is a scanned version of the original document in the Abernethy Manuscripts Collection at Middlebury College.

Pages

p.
Complete

p.

Dear M. [?o] Court [?] May 2 d. 1851

[?] see by the [A??] and [?], that the enemy are attempting to niche me [re???ible] for the wording, the [?] of my [?] speach.

Theres No doubt that the [?] is [?] [?], + is [?] correct; but hurt of it is [?] not [?]

Last edit over 2 years ago by PriscillaH.
p.
Complete

p.

+ none of it showed I be [?] for, is to its very [?] + turns of ex- [?].

Mr. Majud told me their could be no report, of when it offered, I told what I thought a [?] precaution to prevent its being republished without an opportunity to correct it, but, often a [?] or Jo, the extracts [?] into the [?] without being {?] to me. I [?] for [?] put a line into four pipes, to the effect

Last edit over 2 years ago by PriscillaH.
p.
Complete

p.

[?] the report [?] made without my [?], without being [substituted?] to me, + that, while [?] correct, the [p?] [?ology?] to not to be [?] as mine. For see that Mr. [?] founds his entire letter after tho words. When the [?] of what I said has been before the country for three months, it [?] but ill for then that they [?] be no [ea?] to [?] the [?] very turn on forms. I took [?] + pride, while I [a?] to the [?], to [?] at [M?] + every where else, all

Last edit over 2 years ago by PriscillaH.
p.
Complete

p.

R.H. Dana Jr.

Galley of names, + applying of [?]. It is bad Larte, + [?],

[?] [?] Jews [has?] a copy of the paper containing this notice, + it [?] be the beter, the [?] [?] it is confused to that one point.

???? M. Dana J

J.M. Earl, ?

P.S. Don't [allude?] to [?] letter or request for me.

[M.D.?]

Last edit over 2 years ago by PriscillaH.
Displaying all 4 pages