Find A ProjectSign Up To TranscribeSign In
EN
DeutschEnglishEspañolFrançaisPortuguês

Page 7

OverviewTranscribeVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

4 revisions
RCH in KZ at Jul 17, 2022 03:22 PM
RCH in KZ
RCH in KZ
DirkVDB
UVA Law Library

Page 7

John & James Hughes}
------------- vs -------------}
---- Conrad Shafer -----} Motion for a new trial

1. Because the verdict was against
Evidence --
2. Because the verdict was founded
in mistake --
3. Because the Jury [ ] found the verdict
for interest on a note which had before been
found by a verdict to be wholly paid --

R. B. Taney

Page 7

John & James Hughes}
------------- vs -------------}
---- Conrad Shafer -----} Motion for a new trial

1. Because the verdict was against
Evidence --
2. Because the verdict was founded
in mistake --
3. Because the Jury [ ] found the verdict
for interest on a note which had before been
found by a verdict to be wholly paid --
R. B. Taney

The John M. Woolsey Collection of Legal Documents, University of Virginia School of Law Library Special Collections.

http://archives.law.virginia.edu/records/mss/78-6