Page 5

OverviewTranscribeVersionsHelp

Facsimile

Transcription

Status: Page Status Needs Review

removing it from the possession of Thomas but only received from Thomas a
forthcoming Bond for the delivery of the Same and that aftermath and while
the Said property remained in the possession of the Said Thomas the demand
for it was made by the Plaintiff of the defendant and he thus replied that he
could not deliver the Said property because he did not have the possession of
it that there the Plaintiff is not entitled to recover. 2nd That if they believed
that then is no proof that Bradfor demanded the property

Notes and Questions

Nobody has written a note for this page yet

Please sign in to write a note for this page