(Online Participant) Speech concerning Blacks and the Election, [November] 1968

ReadAboutContentsVersionsHelp
1

1

The 1968 elections have given us a President-elect who, for the first time in several years, is not the choice of blacks, poor whites, small farmers, labor unions or any of the constituent groups that made up the grand coalition, built by Franklin D. Roosevelt, and last put into political effect with the election of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.

The demise of that old coalition has occurred concurrently with the rise of the black movement. As black demands have increased, the old coalition has begun to destroy itself, until in 1968, it finds itself totally unable to function.

The black sector of that old coalition, the sector most loyal, most faithful, the section that gave John F. Kennedy the difference between defeat and victory in 1960, that gave Lyndon B. Johnson 98% of their votes in 1964 and Hubert Humphrey a near 90% in 1968, now will find itself in the next four years looking for a political movement to fit into.

The Kennedy years and the rise of student activism in this country run parallel. Four young black college students at a lunch counter in Greensboro, North Carolina on February 1st, 1960, set a tone for student militancy and student protest that has continued to escalate, and as that escalation has continued, so have the public demands of the total black community.

One may quite readily assume that American blacks have always wanted the same things - full manhood rights, control of the institutions of our communities, participation in and control over the decision-making instruments that affect our lives.

That was true one hundred years ago when a black Georgia legislator, Henry McNeill Turner, on the eve of his expulsion from the Georgia legislature, warned the young men of Georgia to "never lift a finger or raise a hand in defnse of Georgia until Georgia acknowledges you are men, and invests you with the rights

Last edit about 1 year ago by sfemet
2

2

pertaining to manhood." It is still true in 1968, when young black men are deciding that their enemies are less likely to be teen-age soliders from the National Liberation Front but rather to be the men and women who make autocratic decisions about the necessity of opposing legitimate revolutions like that in Vietnam.

Even though the underlying goals of the black movement have always been the same, its stated goals have not; thus in 1960, in the South, the goal of the movement that gave birth to student activities, north and south, was the integration of places of public accomodation, of lunch counters, busses, movie theatres, trains and tran stations. The movement was a mov-ment demanding a piece of the existing action, a seat at the table.

That movement began to demand that rural blacks be allowed to participate in their government, a demand that the United States under a liberal Democratic administration did not hasten to support, and precisely the same demand that the government of the United Sates has been resisting in Vietnam for several years.

When the movement became a political movement, whien it began to mount challenges against established political forms, when it becan to link the domestic colonialism of the ghetto with the foreign colonialism in Southeast Asia, when it began to move from the rural, black belt South where opposition was open and public into the urban North, when the opposition goes home to the suburbs every night, then the movement began to fall into dissarray. The tactics that worked in Selma, Alabama would not work in Cicero, Illinois. A nation that hated Jim Clark and Bull Connor sympathized with Mayor Daley. The two forces present in the black community since slavery - assimilationists and integrationism on one hand and separatism on the other - began to vie with each other openly, setting the stage for confusion, for public disagreements between black spokesmen, and for a general lack of direction among the masses.

Last edit about 1 year ago by sfemet
3

3

The debate about the inclusion of whites in the black movement and the susequent withdrawal of some withes caused another period of hesitation.

Now the black movement is halted. It is split into one hundred different groups in one hundred different areas of the country. The day when CORE and SNCC and SCLC and the NAACP could split up the South into areas of concern are gone, and for the most part, ought to have gone.

The day of the independent activists, the indigenous group is here. The day is coming when black people, despairing of waiting for action from Washington or for depending on a leader or a set of leaders, have decided to take matters into their own hands.

In the city of Atlanta, when black political power and black activism used to be in the hands of a small group of men, hundreds of groups and grassroots leaders have arisen. They are tired of the old ways, they are tired to decisions and deals made by the few for the many.

That phenomenon is being repeated everywhere in this nation - there is in fact, a revolution inside the black revolution, if what has happened in this nation from 1960 to the present can dare to be called a revolution.

And so for the next several years black communities are likely to seethe, to boil and explode. Some black people will continue to be confortable, as a great many are; the majority will suffer in poverty and oppression.

From the events of the last several years, from the diversity of movements and groups that now vie for leadership in the black community, ought to come a new sort of movement; there ought to be born a movement of the blacks, by the blacks and for the blacks that will find the ways and means to direct the energies of the total black community.

That does not mean that differening strategies must be abandoned. That does not mean that we require a central leader, but it does require that we in 1968 and beyond, begin to agree on a common set of principles.

Last edit about 1 year ago by Myron Santos
4

4

These ought to include the following:

-that the social system, as we know it, is capable of reformism at best, and will change conditions for some black people but will leave to common condition of most blacks unchanged, or exactly the same.

-that the system then becomes part of the problem we deal with and cannot therefore be part of the solution.

-that black people must retain uppermost in their minds race consciousness, racial solodarity, and racial unity. We may seek to coalese, but only in honest, equal partnerships.

-that we must define, select and elect our own leaders, and not have anyone else choose them for us. Our leadership must be bold, brave, militant, and must have a base - a leadership without a followship is no leadership at all.

-finally, we must always put the race first put in perspective. We ought to remember the words of a great black man, W.E. B. Dubois, who wrote in 193:

"I still think today as yesterday that the color line is the great problem of this centruy. But today I see more clearly that back of the problem of race and color, lies a greater problem which both obscures and implements it: and that is the fact that so many civilized persons are willing to live in comfort even if the price of this is poverty, ignorance and disease for the majority of their fellowmen; that to maintain this priviledge men have waged war until today, war tends to become universal and continuous, and the excuse for this war continues largely to be color and race."

So those black people who want radical, fundamental change in the system that deicides who gets what from whom, the political system, and those white people who would join that struggle, have to decide on a course of action.

That course has got to include an escape from rhetoric and a turn toward action, an action that will make men whole, that will, in the words of Frnzn

Last edit about 1 year ago by Myron Santos
5

5

Fanon, who in writing a prescription for the future of the Third World, suggested a formula that might be apploed here:

"It is a question," he wrote, "of the Third World starting a new history of man, a history which will have regard to the sometimes prodigious theses which Europe has put forward, but which will not forget Europe's crimes, of which the most horrible was created in the heart of man, and consisted of the patho-logial tearing apart of his functions and the crumbling way of his unity.

"There is no question of a return to nature. It is simply a very con-crete question of not dragging men towards mutiliation, of not imposing upon the brain rythyms which very quickly obliterate it and wreck it. The pretext of cathching up must nit be used to push man around, to tear him away from himself or his privacy, to break and kill him.

"No, we do not want to catch up with anyone. What we want to do it go forawrd all the time, night and day, in the company of man, in the company of all men.

It will be difficult for black people, a people scorned by all people, to go forward in the company of all men. It will be difficult for those who have been tricked by politics - or for those who made this past year a few months experiment in politics - to seek political solutions to their common problem.

It will be difficult to organize in a land ruled by men with no concern for human liberties.

It will be difficult. If it is not done, if change does not come, if blood does flow even deeper in the streets, then blame alone cannot fall on the pigs or the new colonialists or the domestic imperialists - it must fall also on those who spoke for change on street corners but did nothing else;

Last edit about 1 year ago by Myron Santos
Records 1 – 5 of 6