mitchell-P044_A-12_1_11

OverviewVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

9 revisions
Samara Cary at Oct 06, 2023 04:50 PM

mitchell-P044_A-12_1_11

VERSO

14

had been so largely re-
cited above, ver. 17 xc.
where God promises the
effusion of the Spirit
on their sons & and their
Daughters. Fam. Expos.
Note on the place.
----------- ---------- -----------
3. Dr. Hammond. "If any have
made use of that very
inconcludent argument,
Acts 2:39, in support of in-
fant baptism, I have noth-
ing to say in defence of
them. The word children
there, is really the posterity
of the Jews, and not pecu-
liarly their infant children,
Works. Vol.1. p.490.
--------- ------------- ------------------
A A
4. Limborch, (a learned Divine
of Amsterdam) By tekna
the Apostle understands
not infants, but posterity; in
which signification, the
word occurs in many
places in the New-Testament,

RECTO

15

see among others John 8:39.
"If ye were Abraham's
children, ye would do
the works of Abraham.
Whence it appears, that the
argument, which is very
commonly taken from this
passage, for the baptism
of infants, is of no force,
and good for Nothing
Comment. in loc.
A A
--------- --------------------- ---------------
So you see the Baptist in
their exposition of this
text are supported by
emminent peopbaptists.
---------------
Once more, those who
were baptized, were those
who had actually received
the word. v.41.
-------------------------
Acts 8:5-12. 35-37.
----------------------
― 9:18. ―
-----------------------------------------
― 10:44 - 47.
― 18:4 - 8.
19:1 - 7 ―

mitchell-P044_A-12_1_11

VERSO
14
had been so largely re-
cited above, ver.17 xc.
where God promises the
effusion of the Spirit
on their sons & and their
Daughters. Fam. Expos.
Note on the place.
-----
3. Dr Hammond. "If any house
made use of that very
inconcludent argument,
Acts 2:39, in support of in-
fant baptism, I have noth-
ing to say in defence of
them. The word children
there, is really the posterity
of the Jews, and not pecu-
liarly their infant children.
A Works. Vol.5. p.490.
-----
4. Limborch, (a learned Divine
of Amsterdam) By [tekng]
the Apostle understands
not infants, but posterity; in
which signification, the
word occurs in many
places in the New- Testament,

RECTO
15
see among others John 8:39.
"If ye were Abraham's
children, ye would do
the works of Abraham.
Whence it appears, that the
argument, which is very
commonly taken from this
passage, for the baptism
of infants, is of no force,
and good for Nothing
Comment. in loc.
A A
-----
So you see the Baptist in
their exposition of this
text are supported by
emminent peobaptists.
-----
Once more, those who
were baptised, were those
who had actually received
the word. v.45.
-----
Acts 8:5--12. 35--37.
-----
----- 9:18. -----
-----
----- 10:44 --- 47.
----- 18:4 --- 8.
19:1 --- 7---