Page 2

nor is the condition unlawful being a regulation or qualification, that a prohibition [?] within the analogy of contracts [??] within certain limits. 27th Co. Lit. 24 in. (P).

3. Does the condition bind the granter's [?] ?

I think the deed, taking the whole together, imparts that neither the granter nor his [?] shall [?] the condition -

4. Is it for the benefit of the granter's [?]?

I..[??] none can have a any benefit of a condition broken saw the grantor this being, Lit. 80-87. (fol. 213. Lit. 348) - 84-5 (fol. 214, Lit. 347) Lom. Dig. 263.

5. What [?], in there for [?] of the condition?

Re-Entry by grantor or his heirs, who are thereupon [?] a for the conveyance of the condition being [??] when the granter this 2 Va. Co Lit. 87 (fol. 218 Lit. 345).

6. If considered as a covenant, are granter to bound by it?

The principle in sentit commodum, sentire debit [??] - whom this principle where [???] by deed in were..[???] two leaded the deed, but the third entered, he was held [?] in a [?] of covenant, the leading of this. - 2 Va. Lo. Lit. 230, n(1). So a[?] of land with a legacy, ... [end is hard to read here]..