8

OverviewTranscribeVersionsHelp

Facsimile

Transcription

Status: Needs Review

6
Control his judgement; "but he certainly cd not allow the child to be [?]
friend to the views of the father'.

In [?] v Cleaver, of 2 Bro. C.C., 501, 510, the father was not permitted
to interfere with the education of his son, to whom a maintenance & a con- siderable portion had had been bequeathed, on condition that the trustees
appointed by the testator shd have the same, guardianship, tuition & manage
mnt of him, during his minority.

In Ex-parte Warner, 4 Pro, C.C, 101, a father was restrained
from exercising his paternal authority on his children, who were edu-
cated at the expense of their relations, & mother not of his own estate, the
father being insolvent, and cruel in the treatment of the mother who
was living apart.

In Lyons v [Bleakin?] Jac. 255, Ld Eldon (C) held that a father
shd be restrained from interfering with the custody of his children to where
their gr. mother had left a maintenance in discretion of their aunt,
& a considerable estate, the father having a very small compentency (£400
a year), & having for many years left his children to their Aunt's con-
trol.

In Colston v Morris, Jacob 257, n(a), a father was restrained
from interfering with his child's management & control, in consequence of a
[portion?] of £ [pounds] 10,000 being left her, on condition that father shd leave her to
the control of the trustees.

In Jackson v. Hankey, Jac. 264, n(a), it was held that where the
father & mother find separate, the income of the father was small, the father's
control might be divided, in favor of the mother if she could and would
make permanent & irrevocable permission for the infant childcare.

In Shelley v Westhrope, Jac, 206, note, it was held that a father's
authority on his children might he controlled on the ground of his profession
& acting on irreligious & immoral principles. He had deserted his wife,
& cohabit with another woman [??] himself an atheist, & published
blasphemous work, denying the truth of the Bible & the existence of a God.

In Kiffin v Kiffin, cited in Duke of Beaufort V Berty, 1 P Wms

Notes and Questions

Nobody has written a note for this page yet

Please sign in to write a note for this page