Pages 6 & 7 - I. The Commission and Its Report & II. Dublin's University Area

OverviewTranscribeVersionsHelp

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is highlighted in red, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

4 revisions
MKMcCabe at Oct 26, 2022 12:13 PM

Pages 6 & 7 - I. The Commission and Its Report & II. Dublin's University Area

6 U.C.D. and the Future

1. THE COMMISSION AND ITS REPORT

The Commission on Accommodation Needsof the Constituent Colleges of
the National University of Ireland was appointed on 26th September, 1957.
Its terms of reference were: 'To enquire into the accommodation needs of the
constituent colleges of the National University of Ireland and to advise as to
how in the present circumstances, these needs could best be met.'

The Report of the Commission was published on 2nd June, 1959. It consists
of four chapters, the first of which, on the needs of U.C.D., had been presented
to the Government as an interim report on 14th June, 1958; the second on U.C.C.
was presented on 18th October, 1958; whilst the third on U.C.G. and the
concluding chapter were presented on 1st May, 1959.

The first chapter and the concluding chapter give the Commission's view
that the space requirements of U.C.D. cannot be met on or near its present site,
and that the only solution is for the College to move to a site on the Stillorgan
Road
over a period of five to ten years. The Commission further recommends
that the Government should make £6,700,000 available to the College over this
period for building needs.

Narrow View of Terms of Reference

The Commission admits (Report p.3) that 'other solutions might present them-
selves if the terms of reference had invited views upon co-ordination within the
University or over a wider field.'

We do not believe that the Government intended to fetter the Commission
by limiting the possible solutions to the problem. Neither can we agree that its
terms of reference compelled it to treat each College as if it existed in isolation
and to exclude all examination of the possibility of co-ordination within the
N.U.I. (leaving the 'wider field' aside for the moment).

It was not, for example, excluded by the terms of reference from considering
the duplication of faculties (particularly the expensive medical and technological
faculties) within the N.U.I. Can, or need, the N.U.I. adequately develop its
three medical schools or its three engineering schools?

In fact, the Commission did insert one recommendation in this regard, when
it says (Report p.77): 'The provision for the accommodation needs of the Faculty
of Agriculture in University College, Dublin will require adjustment if a full
Faculty of Agriculture is established in Cork.' But why the reference to agri-
culture only - what about medicine, engineering and the sciences.

Such questions were, we maintain, well within the terms of reference of the
Commission and should have been considered by it particularly as it was required
to consider the needs of the N.U.I. within the framework of present conditions.
The financial considerations involved in duplication and triplication of faculties
are of paramount importance.

The Minister for Education at the first meeting of the Commission (15th
October, 1957) said that 'it would be their task to examine the problems
objectively and to relate them to the national need.' This latter task the Com-
mission failed to accomplish.

Dublin's University Area 7

Taking its narrow view of the terms of reference, the Commission has
attempted to produce an answer to a purely artificial question: 'What would be
the needs of each College of the N.U.I., if it existed in isolation, serving the
community immediately surrounding it, and if no other institutions of higher
learning or of medical, agricultural or technological education existed in the
country?'

To this hypothetical question the Commission has provided one answer. But
we are as far as ever from a realistic solution of the problems of university
education in Ireland, or even of the problems of U.C.D. Indeed, we hold that
the Commission's recommendations on U.C.D. have only bedevilled the matter.

Haste in Deliberation

The Commission may partly be excused for its narrow view of the terms of
reference by the fact that it was under considerable pressure to complete its study
rapidly owing to the urgency of the accommodation needs of the colleges and
particularly of U.C.D. It is regrettable if the Commission allowed itself to be
rushed by this. A temporary solution by limiting student numbers, or by pro-
viding temporary accommodation, would have been preferable to an incomplete
examination of the problem.

This was the first public examination in many years of any part of the Irish
university question and the very first examination of U.C.D.'s acquisition of the
Stillorgan Road estates. It took place at a time critical to the development of
the Irish universities and of higher education in general including, in particular,
technological, medical and agricultural education. The times are critical also in
the wider spheres of national economics and industrial development, spheres in
which the universities will have to play an important role. After so many years
of official inactivity in the matter of the University College, the fullest, unhurried
consideration should have been given to all the factors involved.

II. DUBLIN'S UNIVERSITY AREA

Advantages as a University Site

Few, if any, capital cities in Europe have within their university areas as
much open space as exists in Dublin in the area extending from Trinity College
southwards to the Grand Canal. We, have, in turn, College Park, Merrion Square, Leinster Lawn, St. Stephen's Green, Iveagh Gardens and 'the Lawn.'

Further, the built-up areas between and around these open spaces have a
very low density of building. Virtually all the existing buildings in the area were
dwelling houses (though now converted, in most cases, to office use) having
long back gardens and, frequently, extensive mews (vide - the area between
Merrion Square South and Baggot Street, or between Lr. Earlsfort Terrace and
Leeson Street, or between St. Stephen's Green East and Pembroke Street).

University College, Dublin, is not hampered in its desire for expansion, as
were older universities in other capitals, by being surrounded by edifices of
great historical, cultural or architectural value (as in Paris, Rome, Madrid,
Vienna) or by extremely valuable commercial property of very high density (as
in Stockholm, Copenhagen, London or in the British industrial cities).

Pages 6 & 7 - I. The Commission and Its Report & II. Dublin's University Area

6 U.C.D. and the Future

1. THE COMMISSION AND ITS REPORT

The Commission on Accommodation Needs of the Constituent Colleges of
the National University of Ireland was appointed on 26th September, 1957.
Its terms of reference were: 'To enquire into the accommodation needs of the
constituent colleges of the National University of Ireland and to advise as to
how in the present circumstances, these needs could best be met.'

The Report of the Commission was published on 2nd June, 1959. It consists
of four chapters, the first of which, on the needs of U.C.D., had been presented
to the Government as an interim report on 14th June, 1958; the second on U.C.C.
was presented on 18th October, 1958; whilst the third on U.C.G. and the
concluding chapter were presented on 1st May, 1959.

The first chapter and the concluding chapter give the Commission's view
that the space requirements of U.C.D. cannot be met on or near its present site,
and that the only solution is for the College to move to a site on the Stillorgan
Road over a period of five to ten years. The Commission further recommends
that the Government should make £6,700,000 available to the College over this
period for building needs.

Narrow View of Terms of Reference

The Commission admits (Report p.3) that 'other solutions might present them-
selves if the terms of reference had invited views upon co-ordination within the
University or over a wider field.'

We do not believe that the Government intended to fetter the Commission
by limiting the possible solutions to the problem. Neither can we agree that its
terms of reference compelled it to treat each College as if it existed in isolation
and to exclude all examination of the possibility of co-ordination within the
N.U.I. (leaving the 'wider field' aside for the moment).

It was not, for example, excluded by the terms of reference from considering
the duplication of faculties (particularly the expensive medical and technological
faculties) within the N.U.I. Can, or need, the N.U.I. adequately develop its
three medical schools or its three engineering schools?

In fact, the Commission did insert one recommendation in this regard, when
it says (Report p.77): 'The provision for the accommodation needs of the Faculty
of Agriculture in University College, Dublin will require adjustment if a full
Faculty of Agriculture is established in Cork.' But why the reference to agri-
culture only - what about medicine, engineering and the sciences.

Such questions were, we maintain, well within the terms of reference of the
Commission and should have been considered by it particularly as it was required
to consider the needs of the N.U.I. within the framework of present conditions.
The financial considerations involved in duplication and triplication of faculties
are of paramount importance.

The Minister for Education at the first meeting of the Commission (15th
October, 1957) said that 'it would be their task to examine the problems
objectively and to relate them to the national need.' This latter task the Com-
mission failed to accomplish.

Dublin's University Area 7

Taking its narrow view of the terms of reference, the Commission has
attempted to produce an answer to a purely artificial question: 'What would be
the needs of each College of the N.U.I., if it existed in isolation, serving the
community immediately surrounding it, and if no other institutions of higher
learning or of medical, agricultural or technological education existed in the
country?'

To this hypothetical question the Commission has provided one answer. But
we are as far as ever from a realistic solution of the problems of university
education in Ireland, or even of the problems of U.C.D. Indeed, we hold that
the Commission's recommendations on U.C.D. have only bedevilled the matter.

Haste in Deliberation

The Commission may partly be excused for its narrow view of the terms of
reference by the fact that it was under considerable pressure to complete its study
rapidly owing to the urgency of the accommodation needs of the colleges and
particularly of U.C.D. It is regrettable if the Commission allowed itself to be
rushed by this. A temporary solution by limiting student numbers, or by pro-
viding temporary accommodation, would have been preferable to an incomplete
examination of the problem.

This was the first public examination in many years of any part of the Irish
university question and the very first examination of U.C.D.'s acquisition of the
Sillorgan Road estates. It took place at a time critical to the development of
the Irish universities and of higher education in general including, in particular,
technological, medical and agricultural education. The times are critical also in
the wider spheres of national economics and industrial development, spheres in
which the universities will have to play an important role. After so many years
of official inactivity in the matter of the University College, the fullest, unhurried
consideration should have been given to all the factors involved.

II. DUBLIN'S UNIVERSITY AREA

Advantages as a University Site

Few, if any, capital cities in Europe have within their university areas as
much open space as exists in Dublin in the area extending from Trinity College
southwards to the Grand Canal. We, have, in turn, College Park, Merrion
Square, Leinster Lawn, St. Stephen's Green, Iveagh Gardens and 'the Lawn.'

Further, the built-up areas between and around these open spaces have a
very low density of building. Virtually all the existing buildings in the area were
dwelling houses (though now converted, in most cases, to office use) having
long back gardens and, frequently, extensive mews (vide - the area between
Merrion Square South and Baggot Street, or between Lr. Earlsfort Terrace and
Leeson Street, or between St. Stephen's Green East and Pembroke Street).

University College, Dublin, is not hampered in its desire for expansion, as
were older universities in other capitals, by being surrounded by edifices of
great historical, cultural or architectural value (as in Paris, Rome, Madrid,
Vienna) or by extremely valuable commercial property of very high density (as
in Stockholm, Copenhagen, London or in the British industrial cities).