5

Prag 5

for the purpose, as freely as they would in chemistry or biology. Indeed as late as 1893, when I might have procured its admission to the "Centruy Dictionary," it did not seem to me to enjoy a vogue sufficient to warrant that step.
But it is time to say what pragmaticsm is; first, however, removing a widespread misapprehension by telling of something that is not, It is not a doctine of metaphysics, but is only the forerunner of a new metaphysical light. (Not having an English Testament by me, I will use the quaint Latin of the Vulgato.)" Non erat ill lux. Et hoc est testieum; Tuquis es?Propheta es tu? et dixit: Non sum Dixerunt ergo ei; Quis es, ut responsum demus his, qui miserunt nos? Quid dices de te ipso? Ait:ego rox clamantis in deserto." It is no doctrine of