MS 844 (1908) - A Neglected Argument - Additament

Papini's declaration that "pragmatism" cannot be defined, that is, that they hold a belief that cannot be definitely stated, suggests at once as a sufficient reason for their rejection of pragmaticism that they are incapable of exact logical thought. I find no alternative between this explanation and one which their own admirable lives refutes.

Every person skilled in Musement will see that the Doctrine of the Ens necessarium has a pragmaticist meaning, although I will not here attempt to sum up the whole of its meaning. So far as it has such meaning, it is verifiable.