EN43
Facsimile
Transcription
Page number:
No of certificate: 62440
Forename: Thomas
Surname: Harries
Born at: Fishguard
Year: 1824
County: Pembroke
Certified as: Mate
Certified at: Fishguard
Date: 16 May 1856
No of certificate : 62441
Forenames: Philip
Surnames: Huelin
Born at: St Brelade
Year: 1829
County: Jersey
certified as: Mate
certified at: London
Date: 16 May 1856
No of certificate: 62442
Forenames: Patrick
Surnames: Hannagan
Born at: Youghal
Year: 1814
County: Cork
certified as: Mate
certified at: Youghal
Date: 26 June 1856
No of certificate: 62443
Forenames: David
Surnames: Harris
Born at: Swansea
Year: 1825
County: Glamorgan
certified as: Mate
Certified at: Liverpool
date: 1 September 1856
No of certificate: 62444
Forenames: John
Surnames: Hutchison
Born at: Edinburgh
Year: 1824
County: Edinburgh
certified as: Mate
certified at: Cardiff
date: 3 September 1856
No of certificate: 62446
Forenames: Humphry
Surnames: Hicks
Born at: St Just
Year: 1812
County: Cornwall
Certified as: Mate
Certified at: Truro
Date: 20 November 1856
No of certificate: 62447
Forenames: Robert
Surname: Hockisston
Born at: Wisbeach [Wisbech]
Year: 1821
County: Cambridge
certified as: Mate
certified at: Wisbeach [Wisbech]
Date: 1 December 1856
No of Certificate: 62448
Forename: James
Surname: Harris
Born at: Lydney
Year: 1825
County: Gloucester
Certified as: Mate
certified at: Swansea
date: 24 January 1857
No of Certificate: 62449
Forename: John
Surname: Henderson
Born at: Dundee
Year: 1817
County: Forfar
Certified as: Mate
Certified at: Dundee
Date: 13 February 1857
No of Certificate: 62450
Forename: John
Surname: Harrison
Born at: Kingscoat [Kingscote]
Year: 1822
County: Gloucester
Certified as: Mate
Certified at: Liverpool
Date: 24 January 1857
Notes and Questions
Please sign in to write a note for this page
Is this the correct use for [ ]?
Yep, spot on. You can always allow yourself some leeway because prevailing spelling at the time may differ from now and be acceptable. Just go with your gut feel, there is no right or wrong. I tend to accept Wisbeach and Anglesea but can't really justify it other than I don't want to clutter transcriptions to clarify the obvious. So you'll be right whatever you choose to do!
"Pigot's Directory of 1830 notes that both 'Wisbeach' and 'Wisbech' were in common use."