13

8r

13

U
H is contracted by W ∝ E
Ω
Y is contracted by A.

Proof of the above relations.

1. If we take A ∝ O both [informatively ??]
it will of [appear ??] that both may be falsetrue if P has no [intension ??]
[or ??] both false if S has no extension. But taking the five
cases of extension that A has 2 and O the other three.

In the same way if we take A ∝ Y [informatively ??]
both may be false if P has no intension & both true if S has no extension. But of the [5 relations ??] of intension A admits
2 and Y the other 3.

Dec 20

I find that a good deal of the above is wrong.
[Propositions ??] have relations of Intension corresponding to
[Subalternation && Contradiction ??] which are relations of Intension.
2 forms of [Propositions ??] are [contradictions ??] when taking any symbol as
predicate [term ??] all [terms ??] are divisible into such which may be
[put ??] as subject [term ??] one x of the other.

Corresponding to this will be a relation between two
forms such that any symbol being taken as subject [term ??]