990771

ReadAboutContentsHelp
A petition was submitted requesting that repairs be made to the sidewalk on Front Street from University to Seneca Street so that businesses in that area would not suffer economic setbacks. The Committee on Streets recommended that the sidewalk be replaced. See full description in Digital Collections

Pages

990771_Page_1
Indexed

990771_Page_1

Sept 29/89 99 REPORT of Street

committee on Petition of Pacific Carpet Co. For repair of sidewalk on Front St from University to and below Seneca St

Filed Sept 29 1889 clerk

Last edit almost 3 years ago by s.fristrom
990771_Page_2
Indexed

990771_Page_2

To the Honorable Mayor and Council of Seattle - We the undersigned doing business on Front St would respectfully call attention to the fact - the sidewalk from University St to and below Seneca St is either destroyed or obstructed so as to be impassible; Thereby being a serious detriment to business - We would there fore request your honorable body to take immediate action on the matter - PacificCarpet Co. John Dantzer H M Simmons A B Olson H T Mears Boston Clothing House W M Ginty & Co Sullivan Bros J C Masel Chas Lond T H Loghed & Son O W Lynch & Co H W Cline C M Finch Lottie D Willard E B Hussey Ben Hazeltine W M Homes M C Hervey Jerome M Souder George W Meagher E J Smith I Buxbaum & Co Golden Eagle

Last edit over 3 years ago by StephanieJoWebb
990771_Page_3
Indexed

990771_Page_3

Petition of Pacific Carpet Co et al for replacing of sidewalk on Front Street between University & Seneca Sts

Last edit over 3 years ago by StephanieJoWebb
990771_Page_4
Indexed

990771_Page_4

To the Honorable Mayor and Common Council of the City of Seattle Gentlemen: Your Committee on Streets to whom was referred the petition of the Pacific Carpet Co et al asking that the sidewalk be replaced on Front Street between University and Seneca St beg to report that after personal inspection we find it unpracticable to repolace said sidewalk at persent the full length of said Block as laid part of said distance, but that the obstruction to travel placed on and along the sidewalk space in front of the lots owned by Mr Rugstorff & Mr Levy are unnecessary are we ordered the same removed, which we understand has been done. We recommend that the sidewalk be ordered replaced as soon as the condition of the buildings adjoining will permit.

Last edit over 3 years ago by StephanieJoWebb
Displaying all 4 pages