SEACPM18850403_Page_3

616
JOURNAL OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE
Apr 3/85
Chas O'Hara for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from April 7, 1885
John Merigan for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from Mar 27, 1885
Robt Walt for retail Malt liquors for 3 months from Apr 4, 1885
Chas G Steinweg for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from Apr 3, 1885
John Collins for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from Mar 25, 1885
Geo K Beede for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from Apr 5, 1885
James Miles for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from Apr 15, 1885
Bittner & Theiler for retail Malt liquors for 3 months from Apri 16, 1885
Joseph Francisco for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from Apr 7, 1885
Wm Busha for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from April 17, 1885
Geo Meister for retail intoxicating liquors for 3 months from April 8, 1885
The vote on granting said application stands as follows, In favor
Harrington, Rinehart, Snyder, Sox, Yesler & Latimer Against the
same none.
Power & Meyers refused a license
Ordered that the application of Powers & Meyers for a Retail liquor license
to sell intoxicating liquors be rejected because the bond therefor is
not in conformity to the provisions of Ordinance No 637. In favor
of rejecting said application Rinehart, Snyder, Sox & Latimer.
Agains rejecting the same Harrington & Yesler
James Swain refused a license
Ordered that the application of James A Swain for a Retail liquor license to
sell malt liquors be rejected for the reason that the place where said
license is to be used is a locality in which the sale or disposal of in-
toxicating or malt liquors shoudl not be allowed.In favor of rejecting
said application Harrington, Rinehart, Snyder, Sox, Yesler & Latimer Against the
same none.
John Farnham refused license
Ordered that the application of John Farnham for a retail license to
sell malt liquors be rejected for the reason that the place where said
license is to be used is a locality in which the sale of disposal of intox-
icating or malt liquors should not be allowed. In favor ot rejecting
said applictaionRinehart, Snyder, Sox, & Latimer Against rejecting the
same Harrington & Yesler
Shaw & Alger refused license
Ordered that the application of Shaw & Alger for a Retail license to sell
intoxicating liquors be rejected because the bond therefore is not in
conformity to the provision of Ordinance No 637. In favor of rejecting said
application Rinehart, Snyder,Sox, Yesler & Latimer. Against rejecting
the same Harrington