# 3

### Facsimile

### Transcription

2

In looking at Table 1 it is evident that the

Totems form two groups of three each representing the class Mukulo

and the class Budthurung respectively. [Each sub class -crossed out]

[has these three totems or rather - crossed out] The totems descend with

the class name to the child from its mother, but the

sub class [totem - crossed out] name changes in each generation.

Table II

F Mukulo - Ipatha Mallee hen

F Mukulo Butha Mallee hen

F Mukulo Ipatha Mallee hen

+c

The marriages and descent from your list are as follows [taking Ipai as -crossed out] I take the first

instance 1 in the Lists Ipai Malle hen [given - crossed out] and I [ommitting the - crossed out] substituting

[the capil- crossed out] A for Mukulo (a) for Ipai and (1) for Mallee Hen totem

M=male F=female. Also following the ordinary Kamilaroi rule given [??]

[M-Aa1-crossed out] M.Aa 1

[F Bd4 - crossed out] F Bd 4

[M Ab3 - crossed out] M Bc 4

[F Bd5- crossed out] FAb-2

M Aa 2

F Bc 6

M Bd 6

F Aa 3

M-Ab 3

F Bd- 5

M-Bc 5

F Ab-1

MAa-1

and to M

da capo

[written in box on right hand side]

But how would this

run if one started

with

Mukulo-Ipai-opossum

thus:

M-Aa 3 (see [note-crossed out] no VI

on p1

FBc 4

M Bd 4

F Aa 1

MA b1

F Bd-5

M Bc5

F Aa 3

+c

[written in box on bottom left of page]

note Do the Wonghi in

counting the descents

(relationships) of any person

count through the father

as in this instance, or

through the mother?

## Notes and Questions

Nobody has written a note for this page yet

Please sign in to write a note for this page