002

That the said twelve jurors were not
of the first eighteen of said fifty jurors
drawn to be summoned pursuant to said order; that
the said twelve jurors so impanneled
were drawn, summoned, selected and impanneled
as aforesaid and not otherwise.

Wherefore the said Respondent
says that the said Jury so impanneled
is not a lawful Jury, and prays judgment
of the Court that the said array
of jurors be quashed.

Southerland & Bates
Spicer Hoge Bishop
& McFarland
Attys for Deft

No. 31
In 2d Dist Court
Utah Territory

The People Etc.
vs.
John D. Lee et al.

Challenge to the
Array of Petit Jurors

Filed July 22, 1875
James R. Wilkins,
Clerk