5

[] 613. Peel v [] 1 Ber. and Pal. 419; Reynolds [] v [Dryloss?]
[], 12 Peh. 504; ^[Dorylan?} v [Harland?], 24 Wend. 49: [] v Furbor [] [] 242; Phillips;s
Adultery, 2 [] 206; [] v [Birves?] 5 MH 62; []
[wrolley?] 3B[] (EeL) 439. Learn from them that []
[] notices [] [] in [] to [stunt?] or in [] []
article before [] and, [] [] guaranator if
^see also "[] v [Woodward?] []. 5 [] [] [] (57 ECL) 816. if [] to [] [] [] So in [] Man [] v [],
[] 475, if is laid down that the [] thaht there []
a reasonable time, notice if the [] of the guarantor is ab-
solute imperative. Notice if the credit given under the [prosector?}