1

that it is the name of a class of things among which S is and if M is P not merely in the lense that _ _ _ _

then S is P.

Here the principle is that
That which is U is what U is.

Everyone of the integrant parts of m is an integrant part of each prime alignot of m x vice sensor

A purely contentless principle. So a logical principle should be.

Now let us take up the synthetic arguments.
Whatever is a character of every thing denoted by U is a character of U. Whatever is has every character of U is denoted by m.

Here are two principles. But they do not apply to induction's hypothesis just as they stand.

that it is the name of a class of things among which S is and if M is P not merely in the lense that _ _ _ _
then S is P.
Here the principle is that
That which is U is what U is.
Everyone of the integrant parts of m is an integrant part of each prime alignot of m x vice sensor
A purely contentless principle. So a logical principle should be.
Now let us take up the synthetic arguments.
Whatever is a character of every thing denoted by U is a character of U. Whatever is has every character of U is denoted by m.
Here are two principles. But they do not apply to induction's hypothesis just as they stand.