Page 2

Overview Transcribe Versions Help

Here you can see all page revisions and compare the changes have been made in each revision. Left column shows the page title and transcription in the selected revision, right column shows what have been changed. Unchanged text is highlighted in white, deleted text is ~~highlighted in red~~, and inserted text is highlighted in green color.

4 revisions

MaryV at Dec 29, 2022 08:55 AM

Page 2

Sec 1 Rob. Pr. [2 (?)]. 416th; 1 (?) Gen, Pr. 775: 2 (?) 148;

In the Consideration of time for Stat. (?) the
day on which the cause of action [asumed?] is
to be included, as an action might have
been commenced that day. (?)
Williams, 15 Mar. 193; (Bac?) (Alv?)(Liion?) of [?]
[D], p 376

When (Compn?) of time is to be made from
an but done, the day on (?) out is done
is to be included.  Bac, Abr. (?) [Q]
p 804. 

There was a review of the previous cases  by Sir W Grant
in [?] v [?] 18 Ves, 255   etc. and the conclusion was
that there was no general, that is "invariable" rule of com-
penstation but that the first day was (?) in either ex-
clusion or inclusion, as the justice reason the case might
require; but says that 'great pledge' "I rather think it wd be
more easy to maintain on testimonial reasoning,  that the 
day of an act done, or an event happening, ought in
all cases to be [?}] than that it shd in all cases 
be included". In that case the day was [?] and the
M.R. appeared to think, whilst he disdained any attempt to
establish a general rule that the day from which the computa-
tion is made is always to be excluded, unless to include it  
is (useful?) to give effect to the intention. 

In [?] [?] [?] 5T.R. 283 it was held in ( [?]
mity with Thomas v Popham, 2 [?]  218 & 2 Inst. 674) that when 
a State. reqd a deed to be enrolled within 20 days of its execution
the day of its ex'on must be [excluded?], and [?] Kenyon sd  "Suppose
the direction of the act had been to enrol the memorial within
one day, cd it be pretended that this meant the same thing 
as if is were sd that is shd be done on the same day on the act
was done? If not, neither can it be continued exclusively, when
a greater  no. of days is allowed". 

This cased indeed (?) o Fox Hall 1 Ball, 193, and (?)
(?) 12 House [40 E.C.H.] 635 and in (?) Pellow (?) (?)
a (?) 134, (?) 

Sec 1 Rob. Pr. [2 (?)]. 416th; 1 (?) Gen, Pr. 775: 2 (?) 148;

In the Consideration of time for Stat. (?) the
day on which the cause of action [asumed?] is
to be included, as an action might have
been commenced that day. (?)
Williams, 15 Mar. 193; (Bac?) (Alv?)(Liion?) of [?]
[D], p 376

When (Compn?) of time is to be made from
an but done, the day on (?) out is done
is to be included. Bac, Abr. (?) [Q]
p 804.

There was a review of the previous cases by Sir W Grant
in [?] v [?] 18 Ves, 255 etc. and the conclusion was
that there was no general, that is "invariable" rule of com-
penstation but that the first day was (?) in either ex-
clusion or inclusion, as the justice reason the case might
require; but says that 'great pledge' "I rather think it wd be
more easy to maintain on testimonial reasoning, that the
day of an act done, or an event happening, ought in
all cases to be [?}] than that it shd in all cases
be included". In that case the day was [?] and the
M.R. appeared to think, whilst he disdained any attempt to
establish a general rule that the day from which the computa-
tion is made is always to be excluded, unless to include it
is (useful?) to give effect to the intention.

In [?] [?] [?] 5T.R. 283 it was held in ( [?]
mity with Thomas v Popham, 2 [?] 218 & 2 Inst. 674) that when
a State. reqd a deed to be enrolled within 20 days of its execution
the day of its ex'on must be [excluded?], and [?] Kenyon sd "Suppose
the direction of the act had been to enrol the memorial within
one day, cd it be pretended that this meant the same thing
as if is were sd that is shd be done on the same day on the act
was done? If not, neither can it be continued exclusively, when
a greater no. of days is allowed".

This cased indeed (?) o Fox Hall 1 Ball, 193, and (?)
(?) 12 House [40 E.C.H.] 635 and in (?) Pellow (?) (?)
a (?) 134, (?)

Page 2

Sec 1 Rob. Pr. [2 (?)]. 416th; 1 (?) Gen, Pr. 775: 2 (?) 148;

In the Consideration of time for (?) the
day on which the cause of action accused is
to be individual, is an action might have
been commenced that day. (?)
(?), 15 Mar. 193; (?) (?)(?)
[D], p 376
When (?) (?) is to be made from
an but done, the day no (?) and is dam
is to be (?), Bac, Abr. (?) [Q]
p 804. 
There won a 9?0 after 9?0 cases (?) 
in (?) (?) and the condiseaon are
that there were no general that is "invisible" made of com-
penstation but that the first was (?) in 
elusion or inclusion, as the justice, reason the case (?)
repive; but says that 'great peace'  (?)
(?) east, to maintain or (?) (?), that the appening 
day of an art done, or on event happening, (?)
all cases to be included, than that it (?) in all cases 
be included. In that case the ay was included and the
M.R. appeared to think (?) for disdained any attempt
(?) a general mile that the day from which the competition
time is made is always to be included, (?) to include it 
in (?) to give effect to the intention. 
In impart follow (?) 5T.R. 283 in way held in (?)
mity with Theras, Phphaven, 2 day 218 (?) that when 
a state. (?) a dead to be (?) (?) 20 days of it execution
the day of it (?) on martle excluded, and (?) (?) 'sapphire
the deviation of the art had been to (?)the memorial (?)
one day, (?) pretended that their meant the (?) they
as if is were (?) that is shd be done on the same day on the cut
way done? If not, neither can is be construed (?) when
a greater  (?) of days in abboud. 
This cased indeed (?) o Fox Hall 1 Ball, 193, and (?)
(?) 12 House [40 E.C.H.] 635 and in (?) Pellow (?) (?)
a (?) 134, (?) 

Sec 1 Rob. Pr. [2 (?)]. 416th; 1 (?) Gen, Pr. 775: 2 (?) 148;

In the Consideration of time for (?) the
day on which the cause of action accused is
to be individual, is an action might have
been commenced that day. (?)
(?), 15 Mar. 193; (?) (?)(?)
[D], p 376
When (?) (?) is to be made from
an but done, the day no (?) and is dam
is to be (?), Bac, Abr. (?) [Q]
p 804.
There won a 9?0 after 9?0 cases (?)
in (?) (?) and the condiseaon are
that there were no general that is "invisible" made of com-
penstation but that the first was (?) in
elusion or inclusion, as the justice, reason the case (?)
repive; but says that 'great peace' (?)
(?) east, to maintain or (?) (?), that the appening
day of an art done, or on event happening, (?)
all cases to be included, than that it (?) in all cases
be included. In that case the ay was included and the
M.R. appeared to think (?) for disdained any attempt
(?) a general mile that the day from which the competition
time is made is always to be included, (?) to include it
in (?) to give effect to the intention.
In impart follow (?) 5T.R. 283 in way held in (?)
mity with Theras, Phphaven, 2 day 218 (?) that when
a state. (?) a dead to be (?) (?) 20 days of it execution
the day of it (?) on martle excluded, and (?) (?) 'sapphire
the deviation of the art had been to (?)the memorial (?)
one day, (?) pretended that their meant the (?) they
as if is were (?) that is shd be done on the same day on the cut
way done? If not, neither can is be construed (?) when
a greater (?) of days in abboud.
This cased indeed (?) o Fox Hall 1 Ball, 193, and (?)
(?) 12 House [40 E.C.H.] 635 and in (?) Pellow (?) (?)
a (?) 134, (?)