Status: Needs Review

I t[strike out] The report was so badly printed
that it is to be revised But
thinking you would like to ged hold
of it before the other papers Dr
Hay has permitted me to send it to you.
He has corrected it so [illegible] dont
let them permit "materialist"[underlined]
for naturalist as they did in
the Report - which makes a
material[underlined] (as [illegible underlined would say) difference
in the sense.
By the way should the full Report
be sent to you dont publish Bainds
article which is old[underlined] old[underlined] and
besides used several times already
and moreover[underlined] I[underlined] want[underlined] to[underlined] use[uderlined] it[uderlined]
myself[underlined] - or at least the grand [illegible]
If you get this early enough on
Tuesday please write immediately if
convenient so that I may get your
letter on Wednesday night should
I get back here by that time. I
do not however care much about

Notes and Questions

Nobody has written a note for this page yet

Please sign in to write a note for this page