ENPages That Mention Reginald H. Thomson
991285
3
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS W. V. Rinehart, Chairman J. W. Van Brocklin Jesse F. Cochran C. G. Heifner, Secretary
Reginald H. Thomson City Engineer
Department of City Engineer Seattle, Washington, Nov 9 1892
To Board of Public Works
Gentlemen: Upon the accompanying petition of Milas Galliher et all for sewers on High and Lombard Sts: - I would say that the Benegette Williams plan provides for a sewer on Lombard but not on High St. The estimated cost of such sewer petitioned for as comes within the system is $3328.00 dollars.
Very respectfully R. H. Thomson City Engr
Council C G Heifner secy
990154
990154_Page_4
No. of No. of Name of Property Owner Lot Blocks
A.C. Curtis 6 1/2 6 9 Eastern Add.
Reginald H. Thomson 1 5 "
G. W. Vining 3 9 " per R. Croft.
990847
990847_Page_4
Board of Public Works
W. V. RINEHART, CHAIRMAN J. W. VAN BROCKLIN, JESSE F. COCHRAN, C. G. HEIFNER, SECRETARY REGINALD H. THOMSON, CITY ENGINEER
DEPARTMENT OF CITY ENGINEER Seattle, Washington, Sept 22 1892
To Board of Public Works
Sir: Gentlemen: I find the facts set forth in the petition to be true. The 14th St. Sewer is intended to end at 60 ft South of Marion St, so that if any now be built it would be better to complete this end of the systemn. I estimate the cost of such proposed improvement as follows:
| 400 lineal feet of pipe laid @ 1 20 per foot | 480.00 |
|---|---|
| 1 Manhole | 50.00 |
| 1 Catch basin | 50.00 |
| 1 Ventilator | 20 -- |
| Total $600.00 |
Very respectfull R. H. Thomson City Engr
991649
991649_Page_6
991649
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
A. JACKSON, CHAIRMAN BOARD PUBLIC WORKS G. N. ALEXANDER, J. W. VAN BROCKLIN, MEMBERSHIP BOARD PUBLIC WORKS
REGINALD H. THOMSON, CITY ENGINEER H. W. SCOTT A. V. BOUILLON, ASSISTANT ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
Seattle, Washington, May 21, 1894
The Hon. Committee on Claims:
Gentlemen:
The statements made in the annexed petition of Lyman E. Knapp I find to be true. I think it proper that the first part of the petition, to wit that the Treasurer had authorized to apply $708.19 of the $826.74 excess heretofore paid, to the benefit of the twenty one lots within the district, should by ordinance reciting all the facts, be granted.
The second half of the petition, that relating to the rebate of the remaining $118.75, I do not think can be granted until all warrants on the street are paid.
Respectfully yours, R. H. Thomson City Engr