EN(seq. 9)
Facsimile
Transcription
me. xvi
petrus a petra dictus . i
Tu es tu
beris cephas . .
et re sed uoce
. est. Cephas
. et . Tria no-
mina
qui pas-
tor erat . est
.
trina salvatoris . -
na .
uasis . In
spe-
cialis. In culpe mor-
talis. In cure pasto-
ralis. in quarto saluta-
ris. ¶ De primo i Tu est*sic
etc. .
agnoscens. cephas firmitas
. fuit
tis. credendis.
sis. . Obediens fuit .
ait primo Obedire
magis . etiam
fuit . xvi Tu es
uiui. fuit a
bo etc.
ut uos faciat obedientes.
agnoscentes filius fir-
mos ¶ De secundo xxii
Dico petre gallus do-
ter abneges me nosse. Ter ne-
gavit sed gallo amare fle-
uit. O quot multo
sed ore.
i se nosse. etc. forni-
odiis. usuris. rapinis.
[COLUMN 2]
. . . et aliis mor-
. ama-
re fleuit. et tu miser forte mil-
lesies negasti . et fles
. Sciat se
deflet . amici.
et .
gallo fleuit. et semel bis.
. forte et et
ties. audisti gallum et heu fles.
Gallus . Job xxx-
viii. dedit gallo .
. audis-
ti . O adiuua
me misero gallo canente
fleat. ¶ De tertio xxi Dixit simoni . diligis me hiis
etc. ibi ter si amet .
ter se amare et ei . pasce
agnos meos. pasce
. fructu
. Vide studiose su-
. oues . pastori. Nec mi-
. . et amara mor-
te eos emerat. x
a pasto-
*A large gap in the parchment appears here. The scribe wrote around it. re si diligat.
. cura pasto-
ralis. de-
bet . Ter si diligit.
cordis
. . expo-
. et .
in .
amore
sed suspicit est
pastor. sed . et lupis et bestiis
oues sepe .
quarto et tricensimo oues mee
eo pastor. .
Notes and Questions
Please sign in to write a note for this page
Great job! Most of these are really minor:
line 1: missing “xvi”
lines 3-4: voca- / beris, not vocaber- / bis (and put the hyphen for consistency)
line 5: is that “petra” rather than “petrus”?
line 5: i would imagine the abbreviation for “diuersa” should be “diusa”, not “duisa”; it’s not really possible to tell from the handwriting, but that is how you expandd it in line 8 (correctly, imo)
line 9: same thing re. “diuersorum”
line 10: yes, looks like “futs” (with the -ur abbreviation on top)
line 11: for “tna” as the abbreviation of “trina” – in my transcription i interpreted that symbol above the t as a superscript i, so “tina”; but i may well be wrong about that (same with “primo” a few lines down, etc.)
line 13: in general when there was just a superscript letter rather than an abbreviation per se, i wrote it in the transcription (so i would’ve included the e in “ggis”)
line 15: i think possumus, not possimus (there’s a total of 5 vertical lines, 2 for the u and 3 for the m)
line 15: i would expand it as “gratie,” not “gratiae,” to follow the scribe’s general convention
line 18: “penitentie,” not “primae”
line 19: “Tu est” is rlly remarkable – maybe put a footnote with a “sic” or the like so future readers know it’s not your typo?
line 25: missing “ait” before “actus”
line 31: missing period after the first “deus” (or rather, it’s in the abbreviation expansion instead of the main text)
line 37: missing a line break after Tytus
line 37: no period after nosse
line 38: the abbreviation is fornicatoib, not -torb
line 38: period after igitur?
line 41: ter, not tamen (cf. line 34)
(a general point i’ve been noticing in the past few lines: ecclesiastical spelling often uses c for t before -i or -e; in words like “centies” or “traditionibus” it’s hard for me to tell if the scribe wrote “centies” or “cencies”/“tradicionibus”)
line 55: petro, not petrus; also missing line break there
line 56: si, not se (“is asked three times if he loves”
line 57: se, not si (“professes that he loves”)
line 74: should be no period after sed
line 76: disperse, not dispersae
oh, and re. "animalium" vs. "animarum," i see that the edition has it as the latter, but i think the former still can make sense in context and really seems to be what the manuscript has, so i think you're good