MS 292-295 (1906) - Prolegomena to an Apology for Pragmaticism

of logic, the question has been disputed since Philo broke away from the leadership of [Didorno?] Cronos as related by Cicero [toward?] the end of the [Lucullus?] book of his [Academical?] Questions. This is one of the most important points of pragmatism as to which I have been compelled to reverse my former opinion. For I now recollect (better than in one of my late [Monsir?] articles) how I formerly insisted upon asking which was the [m?tter] of [?ach] expressed by a conditioned [de?] [inesse?], [B??] I say that [ha?] [interprets?] every conditional judgment [sic] is to hold [tha?] an unactualized possibility is unreal. Nay, that [it?] is even inconceivable. Now after long years of traniing in that [tyne?] of pragmatistic thought which denies the reality of unactualized