Council Proceedings: July 1 and July 15, 1904: Part 1 of 2

ReadAboutContentsHelp

Pages

46
Complete

46

DR. R. CHAMBERS HEALTH OFFICER

C. C. McMICHAEL B. H. SHEPP HEALTH INSPECTORS

T. F. MURRAY J. F. HENDERSON M. M. LYDON HEALTH COMMITTEE

CITY OF FORT WORTH T. J. POWELL, MAYOR

OFFICE: 600 MAIN STREET, UP-STAIRS

ESTIMATED POPULATION, 40,000

MONTHLY REPORT OF BOARD OF HEALTH For Month of June 1904

FORT WORTH, TEXAS 1st July 1904

DEATHS

WHITE COLORED
Male Female Male Female RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT
16 8 14 9 32 14
24 23 47
CASES OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES REPORTED HOSPITAL AND PAUPERS
Small-Pox 14 4 Patients treated in Hospital at a cost of $53.45
Varicella
Diphtheria Drug bills out door patients and prisoners 13.10
Pseudo-Membrane Croup
Scarlet Fever 1
Typhoid Fever 14 Drug Bill and supplies acct. Pest House 6.45
Measles
Mumps
Whooping Cough
Total 29 Total $73.00
BIRTHS REPORT OF HEALTH
WHITE COLORED Number premises inspected 1096
Male Female Male Female Number Notices Given 280
20 17 1 3 Number nuisances summarily abated 86
37 4 41 Number sewer connections ordered 7
Number closet nuisances abated 1125
Number trash cans emptied by City Scavenger 100
Number loads manure, trash and slops removed 235
Number fumigations 6
" Dead Animals & Fowls Removed 125
" Galons Oil use 7
Last edit over 1 year ago by Koliver
47
Complete

47

FILED JUL 15 1904 Jno T. Montgomery City Sec'y

Last edit over 1 year ago by Koliver
48
Complete

48

Auditor's Office.

Fort Worth, Texas, July 15 1904

To the Hon Mayor & City Coucil

Gentlemen:-

We, your committee on Claims recommend that the following Claims duly approved by the City Auditor be allowed and warrants drawn on the funds to which they properly belong, to wit:-

-- --
Street Department- Pay Roll 180.75
Interest Current 452.50
Water Supply 21.75
Water Works Department 1184.65
Total $1839.65
Respectfully Submitted

Q.T. Moreland

Claims Committee

Last edit over 1 year ago by Koliver
49
Complete

49

REPORT OF

Claims Com

8

FILED JUL 15 1904 Jno T. Montgomery City Sec'y

Last edit over 1 year ago by Koliver
50
Complete

50

To the Honorable CIty Council of Fort Worth:

Your petitioner, R. J. Hutchison, respectfully represents:

That he is the owner of 52 by 115 feet out of the south west part of Block No. 28, of Tucker's Addition to the City of Fort Worth, Texas:

That he purchased the said lot during the year 1899, and after the first day of January of said year, paying therfor the sum of $475.

That at the time of his said purchase he erected a one story cottage on said lot of land which up to said time and on said first day of January 1899 was unimproved.

That the reasonable value of said lot o n the first day of January 1899 was the sum of $475.

That neither your petitioner vendor nor your petitioner assessed the said lot for the year 1899 for taxes to the City of Fort Worth:

That the tax Collector of the City of Fort Worth is claiming that there is due to the said City of Fort Worth $27.72, being $15. taxes and $9.72 interest on said petitioners lot for the year 1899, which lot for the said year was assessed by the Tax Assessor of Fort Worth at the sum of $1200.

Your petitioner represents that if it is the petitioners lot for which these taxes are claimed, that then the Tax Assessor assessed said lot together with the improvements thereon at the sum of $1200. which was a reasonable assessment for the said lot and improvements for the said year, provided the said improvements had been subject to assessment for the year 1899, but your petitioner avers and alleges that the said improvements were not on said lot for the said year 1899, and that the tax Assessor in assessing the same erred in that he had no right to assess the said improvements as the same were not in existence on teh first day of January 1899, and were not subject to assessment for taxes for the said year.

Therefore, your petitioner asks that the said error be corrected, and that he be allowed to pay the taxes on said lot for the year 1899 at a reasonable value therefor which your petitioner avers is $475., and that the balance of the said tax assessment being on the improvements, if at all, be cancelled.

Your petitioner offers in settlement of said claim, waiving any and all defects that may exist in said assessment, if your petitioners proposition is accepted, to pay taxes on said lot at the said valuation in settlement of the said claim for taxes.

Respectfully submitted,

R.J. Hutchison By J.B. Davies

Last edit over 1 year ago by Koliver
Displaying pages 46 - 50 of 107 in total